Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 03:19

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why are there so many single moms in America?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Bradford researchers solve mystery of disease and wool trade - BBC
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Kevin Durant stat sheet: 15 key numbers after deal to Rockets - NBA
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
What Wilson said about Logan Gilbert’s second rehab start - Seattle Sports
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
The Dogs of Chernobyl Are Experiencing Rapid Evolution, Study Suggests - MSN
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Uh-Oh! Switch 2's New GameChat Feature Is Transcribing Bad Words - Nintendo Life
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?